Search for: "State in Interest of Et"
Results 1 - 20
of 8,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 8:32 pm
An interesting report from today's Times of India suggests the States currently in opposition to the EU's ETS may not share a vision for aviation emissions policy going forward. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Calabresi, Northwestern University Law, et al. have posted Individual Rights Under State Constitution in 2018: What Rights are Deeply Rooted in a Modern-Day Consensus of the States:This law review article describes what individual rights are protected under state constitutional law today in 2018; in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified; and in 1791, when the federal Bill of Rights was ratified. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:41 am
The decision would address a split between the Second and Ninth Circuits on the topic of NBA preemption of state “interest-on-escrow” laws.... [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:23 am
This is big news and the Statement of Claim is very interesting indeed. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm
Exchange et al., No. 13656 of 2011 (C.P. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:32 am
The state paid its half of the damage award judgment in connection with the accident, with accrued judicial interest. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:42 am
Delphi Automotive Systems LLC et al., 1-09-cv-02191 (ILND July 13, 2009, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Coar, J.) [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:53 am
BMW North America, LLC et al, 9:08-cv-00164 (3/28/11) Judge: Ron Clark Holding: Motion for Prejudgment Interest GRANTED Prejudgment interest is one of those annoying issues (not unlike court costs and postjudgment interest) that even in a practice where you see the far side of a jury trial fairly often, it's sometimes still not quite often enough to remember the law from case to case. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 1:29 am
On August 13th, 2018 in the case of De La Torre et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
An exchange of notes that addresses many points of a future agreement between nations but is silent on certain aspects of the agreement cannot remove the unspoken matter from the realm of justiciable issues under the act of state and related doctrines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Eli Gross et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:05 am
A Colorado state district court has ruled that a non-bank assignee of loans made by a state bank cannot charge the same interest rate that the state bank assignor can charge under Section 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:26 pm
Corly et al., announced today, is a very interesting case. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
§ 1601 et. seq. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Flatland Mineral Fund LP, et al was which party to a Texas mineral deed would bear the burden of two previously reserved nonparticipating royalty interests. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 11:01 am
Finally, the Sixth Circuit concluded that the challengers to the ETS had not shown that a sufficiently irreparable injury would result from lifting the stay, as compared to the injuries the government and public interest would incur if the stay remained in place. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Combs, et al. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:33 pm
That meeting, attended by representatives of widely ranging interests—employers, employees, industry groups, organized labor groups, healthcare professionals, and members of the public at large—lasted 4.5 hours. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:58 am
It includes pdf files of court documents including the complaint, briefs, orders and transcripts from proceedings.From Et Seq. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:51 am
This is from the Government of Canada: Seeking Expression of Interest: At this time, the Government of Canada is seeking applicants for appointment to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) Chapter 28 (General State to State) roster – This roster will be established pursuant to Article 28.11 of the CPTPP and will be used to appoint panel chairs to determine disputes covered by Chapter 28 of the Agreement. [read post]
