Search for: "State of Arizona v. ASARCO"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
In State of Arizona v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
I'll also add, in favor of (F), that the Supreme Court has stated that, in general, a 10-1 ratio of compensatory to punitive damages approaches the "outer limit" of what's permissible under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:03 am
And in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Citing United Food & Comm'l Workers Union, Local 1119, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
A district court’s punitive damage award in a Title VII sexual harassment case was excessive, given that a jury did not award any compensatory damages and awarded only one dollar in nominal damages, ruled the Ninth Circuit in a 2-1 decision (State of Arizona v Asarco, LLC, October 24, 2013, O’Scannlain, D). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:09 pm
In ASARCO, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:51 am
TheCourt explained in ASARCO Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:54 am
Background In State of Arizona v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
ASARCO — bankruptcy judge’s authority to award attorneys’ fees for defending an application for an award of such fees Monday, March 2: Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:04 am
If the Court does reach the core issues in the case of Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Both the state of Arizona and the employee sued ASARCO; the cases were consolidated, and a federal jury found the employer liable for sexual harassment but not retaliation or constructive discharge. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:05 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
This judgment resulted in a successful reorganization, and all of ASARCO’s creditors were paid in full. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
App. 1987), review dismissed, 781 P.2d 1373 (Ariz. 1989), Arizona permits independent claims for medical monitoring, at least in a case asserting an environmental tort. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:18 am
” He went on: “Under this Court’s clear pronouncement in ASARCO, the only relevant question for us here is whether one of the petitioners has standing to seek review by this Court of the state court’s judgment. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
