Search for: "State of Delaware v. Connor."
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Posted by Zachary Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, February 10, 2020 Editor's Note: Zachary Gubler is the Marie Selig Professor of Law at Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
But to date,no Delaware state court has rejected that theory. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
NFIB v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arbino v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:53 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm
Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800, 816-17 (N.D.Iowa 2003) (awarding translation costs of $717.75, including a translator for trial); Friedrich v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
The article analyzed the history of legal decisions in the United States that led the General Assembly to amend its corporate statutes to provide for the advancement of legal fees for corporate directors and compared the legislation to similar statutes in Delaware. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am
El Camino Res., LTD. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
United States, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
But 4 justices agreed with Justice Brennan that knowledge of your product ending up in the forum state -- which virtually certainly existed here -- was good enough even without the "additional conduct" listed by O'Connor, and Justice Steven says that knowledge plus a certain number of continuous sales gets his vote too, resulting (as there) in a majority on that score. [read post]