Search for: "State of Maine v. David N. Grant" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To the extent that the main or only reason that the Court granted certiorari in this case was to clarify the scope of the Sixteenth Amendment, the Court might well consider dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Right now, Nebraska (along with Maine) does not allocate presidential electors in a winner-take-all fashion. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 10.03[A][7] & n.69.6a (rev. ed. 2018); William F. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Citizens' and PNC's Motions to DismissCitizens and PNC both move to dismiss the claims against them under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  (Granted, the Court acknowledged that the resolution of such issues was a highly fact-specific endeavor. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Feb. 7, 2008), but rehearing was granted on other grounds (preemption), and the Despain opinion no longer exists. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So is David Strauss’s theory of common law constitutional adjudication. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) weighs in on Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jeff Ifrah and David Yellen look at Murphy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 922(n), which makes it a crime to purchase or receive a firearm while under indictment for a felony, violates the Second Amendment as understood in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]