Search for: "State of Maine v. Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
The main factors he alleged were his change in employment and Plaintiff’s interference with his limited visitation schedule. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am
Also on Tuesday, Justice Stephen Breyer rejected a request from Maine Republicans asking the court to block the state from using ranked-choice voting in next month’s presidential election. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
App. 127, 189 N.W.2d 879 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 389 Mich. 249, 205 N.W.2d 431 (1973); Davis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
Wilkerson Davis & Wilkerson, P.C. wilkerson@dwlaw.com (512) 482 0614 addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.karlbayer.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D134'; addthis_title = 'Glen+Wilkerson+on+Hall+Street+v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Davis (10th Cir.1995) 55 F.3d 553 ; Combined Management, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 pm
Cir.1996) (citing Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
Davis, 47 M.J. 484, 486 (C.A.A.F. 1998); accord United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
Law enforcement, he said, "is on a teleogical path toward a surveillance state" and the Fourth Amendment is the main bulwark pushing back against that trajectory. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Quintanilla v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Davis v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
But you keep straying from the point of the main post, and want to argue the history of racial discrimination. [read post]
