Search for: "State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
The panel affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States Army Corps of Engineers in an action under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act challenging the Corps' issuance of a permit as part of a project to mine valuable mineral sands near Coos Bay, Oregon. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
Army Corps of Engineers, and a local Chicago water district. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Army Corps of Engineers - 4/10/15. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Alcoa Inc., et al, Civil No. 2:10-cv-05051-GW (PLAx) (C.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
