Search for: "State of Ohio v. Mark Barnett" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
Barry Barnett Blawgletter adores Samuel Clemens. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am by Gerard Magliocca
  See id. at § –. [2] See Randy Barnett, Is Health-Care Reform Constitutional? [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(To give one example, courts, including in my state of Ohio, may impose lengthy "headstart" injunctions "in order to eliminate commercial advantage that otherwise would be derived from the misappropriation. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]