Search for: "State of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
 In December 2004, the state court class amended its petition to add Mobil Exploration & Producing, US (“MEPUS”) and Mobil Natural Gas, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Tokai Corp., 2 S.W.3d 251, 257-58 (Tex. 1999); General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Appx. 689, 693 (10th Cir. 2011) (Phelan principle “ is especially true when a federal court is asked to make a policy laden choice for the State of Utah”); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Susan Montoya Bryan, The Associated Press, April 27, 2010 The Bureau of Land Management and conservation groups have settled an eight-year dispute over a management plan for nearly 10,000 natural gas wells in the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Fla. 1995) (same).GeorgiaThe Georgia consumer protection provides only for injunctive relief, Ga. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Id. at 230 (FDA "d[id] not include" Plaintiffs' claimed requirement); 230 (Plaintiffs' claim "at best a tenuous assertion and, at worst, an outright mischaracterization of the record"); 230 ("the record flatly contradicts plaintiffs' position"); 231 (describing "specious nature of plaintiffs' claim"); 231-32 (claims based upon "inapplicable" materials). [read post]