Search for: "State of Oregon v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit (en banc): Have you read McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The study’s emphasis on early-voting options meant states like Washington and Oregon, where voting is conducted entirely by mail, ended up at the top of the rankings. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
See Davis ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
As a result of Ramos, the two states that had been permitting and using non-unanimous jury rules for criminal trials—Louisiana and Oregon—were required to retry (or let free) the several hundred convicted persons in those states whose juries were not unanimous and whose cases were still on direct appeal.Last month, in Edwards v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
” Yair Cohen, Cohen Davis Solicitors [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
” Of course, that litigation process within the states may involve rulings from the United States Supreme Court, as in Bush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Oregon, a 1972 case that permitted nonunanimous juries to convict on state criminal charges. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
As criticism of these events rolled in—including from virtually every relevant state and local official in Oregon—the Department of Homeland Security scheduled a press conference earlier this week to try to reclaim the narrative. [read post]
