Search for: "State of South Carolina v. United States et al" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
“In the United States, Escherichia coli O157:H7 causes ≈73,000 infections and 60 deaths annually (1). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Interestingly (but this doesn't weaken the effort in the slightest) Epic's home state of North Carolina is not among them.Here's the 35 state AGs' amicus brief (this post continues below the document):22-01-27 Utah Et Al. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:38 pm by Doug Cornelius
Ky. 2012) (purchases of properties in Kentucky and South Carolina); United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Miracle Hill, a foster care placement agency in South Carolina, received a waiver from the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Concepcion, et al., Case No. 1:18CV20875-KMM (S.D. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am by Steven Cohen
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et alUnited States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]