Search for: "State of Texas v. U.s., Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm
Distributor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days notice to Owner if the Force Majeure Event affecting Owner is not prevalent throughout the recording industry in the United States and continues for one hundred and eighty (180) days. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:50 am
Wayfair decision, in which the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud Mail fraud and wire fraud are allegations made solely by the federal authorities since by definition, these crimes involve crossing the state line and therefore, interstate commerce. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Examples of problematic conduct includes: 42 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Former Northern District of Texas U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
The opinion first recited the history of the dormant Commerce Clause, a doctrine that prevents states from discriminating against interstate commerce or placing undue burdens upon interstate commerce. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
The United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual The 2016 U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
United States, 581 U.S., 137 S. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Texas has an Access to Justice Commission; but don’t be fooled. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Congress' power, in effect, is converted into an exclusive power to "regulate interstate commerce," and States may not exercise that power or interfere with Congress' excercise of it by "imposing excessive burdens on interstate commerce without congressional approval. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Congress' power, in effect, is converted into an exclusive power to "regulate interstate commerce," and States may not exercise that power or interfere with Congress' excercise of it by "imposing excessive burdens on interstate commerce without congressional approval. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
(Texas’ two state-on-top appeals concerning its congressional and statehouse voting districts were consolidated.) [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The state has asked the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Commercial Activity Tax Liability by Gross Receipts Range[3] Annual Gross Receipts Minimum Tax Liability CAT Liability $0 – $150,000 n/a n/a $150,001 – $1,000,000 $150 n/a $1,000,001 – $2,000,000 $800 0.26% on receipts > $1 million $2,000,001 – $4,000,000 $2,100 0.26% on receipts > $1 million $4,000,001+ $2,600 0.26% on receipts > $1 million The tax casts a broad net, applying to any person or business which “owns or uses any capital in Ohio, is authorized to… [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Bush named him U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 1:45 pm
” Third, the toll or user fee must “not discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
As the Ohio complaint states, “In sweeping terms, [the Rule] purports to extend federal regulatory jurisdiction over broad swaths of the country, including vast areas within the States of Ohio and Michigan, that in no way constitute navigable, potentially navigable, or interstate waters—even in various instances reaching land that is typically dry. [read post]
