Search for: "State of Utah v. Banks"
Results 21 - 40
of 266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 3:06 pm
OppFi’s complaint alleges that because the Bank and not OppFi is making the Program Loans and the Bank is a state-chartered FDIC-insured bank located in Utah, the Bank is authorized by Section 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to charge interest on its loans, including loans to California residents, at a rate allowed by Utah law regardless of any California law imposing a lower interest rate limit. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
This class action lawsuit, filed by three Wells Fargo customers in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, called for at least $5 million in damages, as well as potential punitive damages, stemming from the bank’s opening of at least 2 million accounts that its customers did not authorize. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
This class action lawsuit, filed by three Wells Fargo customers in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, called for at least $5 million in damages, as well as potential punitive damages, stemming from the bank’s opening of at least 2 million accounts that its customers did not authorize. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
(Utah) (granting Utah landowners’ motion for class certification on Trails Act takings case); Toscano v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:42 am
In analyzing the respective interests of the states involved, the Third Circuit stated, “It is not unreasonable to assume that the Utah law was enacted because of policies honoring freedom-of-contract principles and intending to protect Utah banks from unwarranted class-action suits. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
NC Financial Solutions of Utah, LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:10 pm
Wells Fargo & Company (Fraudulent Banking Practices)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlThe People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:26 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 5:45 pm
Wells Fargo Bank and WRI Opportunity Loans II LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:57 pm
"In February 2008, Edmondson joined several other state attorneys general (Idaho, Alaska, Florida, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin) on an amicus brief asking the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 10:36 am
However, in states where 160% APR is legal, OppFi names itself as the lender in the loan contracts, but in states where such APR is illegal, OppFi instead names a Utah-state chartered bank as the purported lender and OppFi as the loan servicer. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:28 am
Utah Dep’t of Corr., 79 F.3d 1024, 1029–30 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:00 am
Dutcher v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:13 am
Briggs repaid them the amounts stated in the discovery response. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:32 pm
Plains Commerce Bank v. [read post]
