Search for: "State v Harlow" Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 6:58 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0443, 2010 MT 60, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:48 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0132, 2011 MT 296, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Williams, Gabriel Contreras Jr., April Harlow, Alfonso Rodriguez, Michael Brice, and Walter Widener, Jr.. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 From PQ Monthly: Oregon State Bar Unveils Diversity & Inclusion Story Wall.From History News Network: Harlow Giles Unger on "Why Naming John Marshall Chief Justice Was John Adams’s 'Greatest Gift' to the Nation. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:38 am
Coombe asserted a defense of qualified immunity with respect to the constitutional claims, where "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory of constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known", quoting Harlow v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:16 am
§ § 7-14-101 through 7-14-108.The Court found that consistent with Harlow v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am by Peter Altieri
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
** The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, citing Harlow v Fitzgerald, 457 US 800, said that qualified immunity may be claimed by public officers and employees in civil suits seeking damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]