Search for: "State v Swinton" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 2:57 pm
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York heard the case of The People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:06 am
Supreme Court dismissed Shabazz’s petition; the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling.Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Appellate Division said that a probationary employee may only challenge his or her termination if he or she demonstrates that he or she was dismissed in bad faith or for an improper reason. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Supreme Court dismissed Shabazz's petition; the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's ruling.Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Appellate Division said that a probationary employee may only challenge his or her termination if he or she demonstrates that he or she was dismissed in bad faith or for an improper reason. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
"Citing Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the court said it had to apply a "stringent standard of review" in considering termination cases of probationary employees. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”In Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, the Court of Appeals held that with respect to an employer providing a former employee with a “name clearing hearing,” the material in the individual’s personnel records objected to must be “stigmatizing in the constitutional sense,” and not merely charges of “individual or isolated instances of bad judgment or incompetent performance of duties. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Probationary employee challenging his or her termination must show bad faith or an improper or impermissible reason underlies the terminationMatter of Mathis v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2011 NY Slip Op 01190, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentProbationary correction officer Demar Mathis filed an Article 78 petition challenging his termination from his employment for “failure to complete his probationary period in a satisfactory manner. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Steven’s recent publications include: “Digital Evidence as Hearsay”, Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review (October 2009) Volume 6, The HIPAA Technology Challenge: Protecting the Integrity of Health Care Information, California Health Law News – Volume XXVI, Issue 1, Winter 2007/2008; Spoliation in the Digital Universe, The SciTech Lawyer, Science and Technology Law Section of the American Bar Association, Fall 2007; Life After Sarbanes-Oxley – The Merger… [read post]