Search for: "State v. $18,000"
Results 1 - 20
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 9:04 am
They rely on Miles v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm
The Court relied on Barnes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
In the case of Sciulli v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
US v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 8:32 pm
" The boat had about 18,000 pounds of fish aboard. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:07 pm
The post Vehicles v Pedestrians appeared first on Tobin Injury Law. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:52 am
" Copyright (c) 2010, 2011 by John V. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:48 am
He also stated that the profit from the store was about $ 18,000 per year, and the expansion would at least quadruple that amount to $ 72,000 per year. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over is increased from $2,500 to $3,000.The annual compensation limitation under Section 401(a)(17) for eligible participants in certain governmental plans that, under the plan as in effect on July 1, 1993, allowed cost of living adjustments to the compensation limitation under the plan under… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:08 pm
Iowa 2014); East Sussex Children Servs. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:18 am
As of October, there were over 18,000 voter registration applications on hold in Kansas because the state hadn't received citizenship documentation. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:03 am
In Diep v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:18 am
But, because of special circumstances — the employer’s apparently “honest mistake and good faith belief” that $70,000 represented the entire amount — the court reduced the fee award by 25 percent, which took it to just over $18,000. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
That is the question that will now be asked of juries as a result of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
Dent earned over $18,000 in overtime pay for overtime shifts that she actually worked. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:18 am
The case of McNaughton v. [read post]
