Search for: "State v. A-1 DISPOSAL" Results 61 - 80 of 2,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 8:05 am by Matt C. Bailey
” See Slip Opinion (Concurrence), at 1-2 (“although I adhere to my views on purposes-and-objectives pre-emption, see Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:12 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Apart from above, amendments in Sections 2(l)(e), 2(l)(f)(iii), 7(4)(b), 8(1) and (2), 9, 11, 12(1), 14(1), 16A, 17(3), 23, 24, 25, 28(3), 31(7)(b), 34 (2A) 37, 48, 56 and in Section 57 are also proposed for making arbitration process more effective.Source: Cached Copy of the PIB Press Release (link). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
In her first opinion on the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan reports the Justices' 8-1 ruling that a consumer debtor cannot deduct the IRS standard automobile ownership costs from his or her disposable monthly income under the means test if the automobile is free and clear. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1990) (stating that “apparatus claimscover what a device is, not what a device does”). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
The basic issue the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit was asked to resolve in the Taylor case was whether or not Taylor’s employee contributions to the Retirement System, required by State law, was “disposable income” within the meaning of the federal Bankruptcy Code. [read post]