Search for: "State v. Addis" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 81 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer (Addis Ababa) [2013] UKSC 81 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JSC BTA Bank v Granton Trade Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 564 (01 May 2012) AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer – Addis Ababa [2012] EWCA Civ 563 (01 May 2012) Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 (01 May 2012) Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor v Minkin [2012] EWCA Civ 546 (01 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Rai & Ors v The Charity Commission for… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Background Three years ago in AA (Somalia) v ECO (Addis Ababa) [2013] UKSC 81, the Supreme Court considered whether a Somali child in her brother-in-law’s care under the doctrine of Kafalah – a process of legal guardianship and the Islamic equivalent to adoption – was an adopted child under the Immigration Rules, paragraph 352D relating to leave to enter or remain as the child of a refugee. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:15 pm by Sherry Knowles
Athena Diagnostics filed a petition for en banc rehearing of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:04 am by Unknown
Nobles (Criminal Jurisdiction; North Carolina Racial Justice Act)Addy S. v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Acumen Law Corporation, 2021 BCCA 189 (CanLII) [57] Historically, damages in a wrongful dismissal action were limited to the loss suffered as a result of the employer’s failure to give proper notice: Addis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
The State (Trinidad And Tobago) [2008] UKPC 16 (3 March 2008) Knight v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
Anonymity The Judge began his judgment by stating the “general rule” that the names of the parties to an action should be included in the orders and judgments of the Court. [read post]