Search for: "State v. Akerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 3:13 pm
In the case of Re: Akerman, Akerman v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:25 am
According to a recent filing with the California federal district court in the United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:39 am
United States, ___ U.S. ____, No. 07-1309, 2009 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:29 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:58 am
It stated however that there was no point in allowing the appeal and remitting it to the county court. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:11 am
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:15 am
(MN) Frederick Andrew Braunstein, Akerman LLP (left the case in 2021) Reena Jain, Akerman LLP (left the case in 2021) Ronald J. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
In addition to traditional state remedies such as misappropriation of trade secrets, employers have been “increasingly taking advantage of... [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) v Akerman-Livingstone (AP), heard 10 December 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
For example, the 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
By: Nick Akerman You may not, as reflected in the recently reported decision of Eagle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
The case is Knopf v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:01 am
v=svxQH7a3SwM&feature=youtu.be [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:16 am
” “Anthony V. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) v Akerman-Livingstone (AP), heard 10 December 2014. [read post]
