Search for: "State v. Anthony D. Anderson" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2017, 8:02 am by MBettman
” Supreme Court of Ohio Decision: OK To Try Anderson Again On September 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision, State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Snyder, 277 So. 2d 660, 668 (La. 1973) (on rehearing), rev’d on other grounds, 305 So. 2d 334 (La. 1974); State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court struck down the federal corruption convictions of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell, comes from Taylor Anderson, who in The (Bend, Ore.) [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Law Journal,  Anthony Franze and Reeves Anderson analyze the Supreme Court’s amicus docket last term, concluding that “amici continued to play an important institutional role at the Supreme Court, and that certain types of briefs got noticed more than others. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:04 am by cdw
Missed last week, but leading off this edition, is Phillip Anthony Summers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
  Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections FLSD Graham General Petition   for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)   Plaintiff: Carlyle Anthony   Green. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In the National Law Journal, Anthony Franze and Reeves Anderson examine the influence of amicus briefs on last term’s Supreme Court cases, noting that “amici filed more than 860 briefs, participated in more than 90 percent of merits cases, and, more often than not, seemed to capture the justices’ attention. [read post]