Search for: "State v. Armstrong" Results 201 - 220 of 684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
It prohibits any “Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States]” from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
The specific question that the justices had been asked to review in Armstrong v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Peter Groves
Copyright Act to reclaim the rights after the statutory 35 years was contrary to the terms of the contract and amounted to a derogation from grant (reminding me again of BL v Armstrong, which I have been making my students in Nottingham read recently - it's good for the soul).But surely (I hear you say) the statute overrides the contract? [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]