Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2022, 1:52 am
Arnold: Artificial intelligence and party autonomy – legal capacity and capacity for choice of law in private international law Artificial intelligence is already fundamentally shaping our lives. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
” Whistleblowers filed separate qui tam lawsuits in federal court in Los Angeles, one by former Prime executive Martin Mansukhani and the other by “Marsha Arnold and Joseph Hill, who were formerly employed in the billing office at Shasta Regional Medical Center, a Prime hospital in Redding, California. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
Where there is a chain of landlords, more than one may be liable for an offence (see Rakusen v Jepson (2021) EWCA Civ 1150, per Arnold LJ at (33)). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter, is among the counsel to the NAACP in this case.] [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter, is among the counsel to the NAACP in this case.] [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
Arnold, not People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
I'm sure they just couldn't do anything about Judge Kuehnen, who based on how that (mis)judgment reads was just hell-bent to enjoin and may have known SWM's lead counsel too well as a result of certain seminars they co-organized.The Arnold Ruess firm made Quinn Emanuel almost look like fools when Arnold Ruess represented Nokia and Quinn was defending Daimler. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:43 am
Avana Epperson-Temple, a litigation attorney at the Boston-based law firm Peabody & Arnold, discusses volunteerism and work-life balance in Episode 2: Pathways of the Women of Color: Legal Diaries, hosted by Massachusetts lawyer Naitasia V. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
The court is to construe the contract so as to give effect to the parties’ intention as disclosed by the language read in context (Arnold v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
Arnold LJ Arnold LJ also summarised t [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
Arnold LJ is the preeminent patent law specialist on the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
Arnold LJ is the preeminent patent law specialist on the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
