Search for: "State v. Augustus"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
In Augustus v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:17 am
See Augustus v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
In weighing Augustus v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Augustus Mendenhall v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
The California Supreme Court dropped a pretty big opinion in the wage and hour world today, reversing the Court of Appeal in Augustus v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
In Jennifer Augustus v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:59 am
In Augustus v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:47 pm
In our last post of 2016, I was complaining about the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
In a victory for California businesses, the 2nd District Court of Appeal has ruled in an unpublished opinion that on-call rest periods are lawful. 2nd Appellate Court Ruling In Jennifer Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
Supreme Court Ruling In Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:27 pm
In Augustus v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm
On December 22, 2016, the California Supreme Court issued a critical decision in Augustus v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:11 am
In the case of Augustus v ABM Security Servs., Inc. (2016) 2 C5th 257, the court held that the plaintiffs, security guards, need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their rest breaks. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
On January 29, 2015, the California Court of Appeal published its long-awaited decision in Augustus v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
On January 29, 2015, the California Court of Appeal published its long-awaited decision in Augustus v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:03 am
Carter Coal Co., 239; United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 pm
Augustus v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:22 am
Oil Facility Emergency Responder Exception for Employee Breaks The California Supreme Court in its 2016 decision Augustus v ABM Security Services held that the plaintiffs (security guards) need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their statutorily mandated rest breaks. [read post]