Search for: "State v. Augustus"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 12:57 pm
Augustus Claus, John Michael Frick, Tim Akpinar, Anthony M. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
The Glendoe Scheme is a state-of-the-art facility first opened by HM The Queen in 2009 and the only large-scale hydro-electric station of its type built in the UK in the last 50 years. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 pm
Augustus v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Nineteenth-century logician Augustus De Morgan? [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:08 pm
Augustus v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:46 am
In BML Properties Ltd. v China Const. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:55 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am
Prior to 2008, C-Air was equally owned by three shareholders: Salvatore Stile, Milton Heid, and Augustus Antico, all of whom were active participants in C-Air’s business. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:03 am
Carter Coal Co., 239; United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:52 am
The court pointed to the 2016 California Supreme Court case, Augustus v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:22 am
Oil Facility Emergency Responder Exception for Employee Breaks The California Supreme Court in its 2016 decision Augustus v ABM Security Services held that the plaintiffs (security guards) need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their statutorily mandated rest breaks. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:11 am
In the case of Augustus v ABM Security Servs., Inc. (2016) 2 C5th 257, the court held that the plaintiffs, security guards, need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their rest breaks. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
This initiative followed a December 2016 California Supreme Court decision, Augustus v. [read post]
