Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 761 - 780 of 2,710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Financial reporting, GAAP, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Amicus Brief of Law and Finance Professors in Verition Partners v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Gregory, Sidley Austin LLP, on Thursday, January 10, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Corporate Governance Reform and Transparency Act, Engagement, ESG, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting Investor Demand for Internal Control Audits of Large U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
However, the state prosecutors' association's board is dominated by rural DAs pushing more regressive agendas, with key staff held over from the era when Chuck Rosenthal and John Bradley dominated the group's politics. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Sullivan, 372, 327 U.S. 58, 70 (1963) and Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]