Search for: "State v. Azure" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 5:47 am by Barry Sookman
In the United States, standing requires that the plaintiff either own the patent being asserted or at least have exclusive rights to the patent. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
Today, the Fourth District, in an opinion by Justice Ikola, disagrees, and concludes that the dissent of Justice Mallano in that case was more persuasive.Property gets transferred to the state all the time. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm by Matthew Campbell
-response-to-mtdDownload doc.-025-statement-of-interest-of-the-us-turtle-mtn-v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
  Although relevant, a party's intention in entering into the agreement is not dispositive (Azure Networks v CSR (2014)). [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
In essence, the General Court annulled the EUIPO BoA decision that invalidated the EUTM “Damier Azur”, stating that the BoA had erred in its assessment of distinctive character acquired through use of the mark at issue, as it had wrongly limited its analysis to a restricted set of evidence. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
The Judge adopted the approach laid down by Mann J in Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery [2008] EWHC 989 (Pat) and that of the Court of Appeal in Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2007] FSR 9, explaining (at [22]) that “[t]his exclusion operates to limit the level of generality at which a definition of the design to be relied on can be stated: the more abstract the definition relied on, the more likely it is to fall foul of the… [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 6:05 am by Barry Sookman
| Barry Sookman https://t.co/UR9NMgcbjR -> Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 02/17/17 https://t.co/o3ZV7TpV0e -> The Myth of DRM-Free Music, Revisited https://t.co/odQrx5BuyG -> Case Law, Australia: Google Inc v Trkulja, Trkuljga III not as good as the originals – Justin Castelan https://t.co/7yUgw5wK66 -> Legal professional privilege can protect businesses that fall victim to cyber attacks, say experts https://t.co/uNEZlijfTg -> CJEU: EU can conclude Marrakesh… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:56 am
Azure, West Virginia, Arkansas in Henry v. [read post]