Search for: "State v. Azure"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 am
Here is the complaint in Azure v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:35 am
In Azure Limited v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:29 am
Azurity Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:26 pm
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Côte D’Azur; b. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
Today, the Fourth District, in an opinion by Justice Ikola, disagrees, and concludes that the dissent of Justice Mallano in that case was more persuasive.Property gets transferred to the state all the time. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Under Cheek v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 10:05 pm
-response-to-mtdDownload doc.-025-statement-of-interest-of-the-us-turtle-mtn-v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:29 am
United States (D. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
Although relevant, a party's intention in entering into the agreement is not dispositive (Azure Networks v CSR (2014)). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
Case citation: Russo v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 12:07 am
The dissenting opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:44 am
That is a fact, and it was also mentioned during last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:51 am
The post ACS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am
In essence, the General Court annulled the EUIPO BoA decision that invalidated the EUTM “Damier Azur”, stating that the BoA had erred in its assessment of distinctive character acquired through use of the mark at issue, as it had wrongly limited its analysis to a restricted set of evidence. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
The Judge adopted the approach laid down by Mann J in Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery [2008] EWHC 989 (Pat) and that of the Court of Appeal in Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2007] FSR 9, explaining (at [22]) that “[t]his exclusion operates to limit the level of generality at which a definition of the design to be relied on can be stated: the more abstract the definition relied on, the more likely it is to fall foul of the… [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 10:12 am
Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:56 am
Azure, West Virginia, Arkansas in Henry v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
