Search for: "State v. Azure"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am
In essence, the General Court annulled the EUIPO BoA decision that invalidated the EUTM “Damier Azur”, stating that the BoA had erred in its assessment of distinctive character acquired through use of the mark at issue, as it had wrongly limited its analysis to a restricted set of evidence. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Firvanq® (Vancomycin Hydrochloride for Oral Solution), Vancomycin 50 mg/mL Kit has been recalled by Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. after the kits were found to contain the wrong diluent. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 3:15 am
Lawrence Testing v Lanark Leeds Distribution Ltd., 2019 CanLII 69697 https://t.co/pMVpHXRNUV 2019-07-31 Katy Perry and others found guilty of copyright infringement https://t.co/7gSTldlxDN 2019-07-31 Artist Sues Ellen DeGeneres, Walmart Over "Love" Logo On EV1 Apparel Line https://t.co/qNbKwNdazE 2019-07-31 Artificial Intelligence And Autonomous Systems Legal Update (2Q19) https://t.co/zNPh43yA0W 2019-07-31 Microsoft invests $1 billion in OpenAI to develop AI technologies on… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:23 am
Section 230 * Weimer v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:51 am
The post ACS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
Although relevant, a party's intention in entering into the agreement is not dispositive (Azure Networks v CSR (2014)). [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 10:12 am
Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The panel began with a discussion of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:45 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-11 https://t.co/7lED1yoHpU -> Copyright subsists in standards AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS v. [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 6:05 am
| Barry Sookman https://t.co/UR9NMgcbjR -> Copyhype Friday’s Endnotes – 02/17/17 https://t.co/o3ZV7TpV0e -> The Myth of DRM-Free Music, Revisited https://t.co/odQrx5BuyG -> Case Law, Australia: Google Inc v Trkulja, Trkuljga III not as good as the originals – Justin Castelan https://t.co/7yUgw5wK66 -> Legal professional privilege can protect businesses that fall victim to cyber attacks, say experts https://t.co/uNEZlijfTg -> CJEU: EU can conclude Marrakesh… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
In the United States, standing requires that the plaintiff either own the patent being asserted or at least have exclusive rights to the patent. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:29 am
United States (D. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
GravesCase number: 11-cv-00176 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee)Case filed: April 15, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 1, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-107 SEC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Under Cheek v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
Galerie Enrico Navarra v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
The Judge adopted the approach laid down by Mann J in Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery [2008] EWHC 989 (Pat) and that of the Court of Appeal in Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2007] FSR 9, explaining (at [22]) that “[t]his exclusion operates to limit the level of generality at which a definition of the design to be relied on can be stated: the more abstract the definition relied on, the more likely it is to fall foul of the… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Balasubramaniam, Department of Food Science and Technology at Ohio State University, who has been conducting HPP research since 1995, is quick to agree with Cargill officials that the company's "Fressure" hamburgers represent a technological breakthrough. [read post]
