Search for: "State v. B. C."
Results 1 - 20
of 15,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2019, 9:10 pm
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Holloway v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm
This week, the Fourth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am
The determinations of the Board were all supported by substantial evidence (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:23 am
Among the nine majority opinions (which is more than I've seen in a while - and right before Christmas, too) is State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:49 am
Complaint in Intervention Exhibit B to US Complaint in Intervention Exhibit C to US Complaint in Intervention [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:30 am
§ 924(c)(3)(B) unconstitutionally vague in the light of Sessions v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
This year the Supreme Court Historical Society’s Frank C. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
Check the Dillon v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:15 am
Today, the European Court of Justice pronounced its judgment in Case C-386/05 (Color Drack GmbH v LEXX International Vertriebs GmbH). [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
§ 1513(b)(1), (c) and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
The government argued that the sentence should be reviewed for an abuse of discretion, while Solomon argued that his sentence must be reviewed for "reasonableness" under United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459 was concerned with a CFA with a success fee that was entered into after liability had been admitted by the Defendant's insurers. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:55 am
United States, 578 U.S. 120 (2016), that Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
The Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and ruled that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court's 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
