Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 61 - 80
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm
The dissenting judgments of Baroness Hale and Lord Kerr offer some hope to campaigners, and the appellants will take their case to Strasbourg (despite the earlier case of A, B and C v Ireland, which held that Article 8 rights cannot be interpreted as providing a right to an abortion). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
In the meantime Marilyn Stowe and Baroness Deech, cross-bench peer, discussed the the case, life long spousal maintenance agreements and the state of the law generally as to financial settlements on divorce, in Women’s Hour on Radio 4 here. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:31 am
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58R (on the application of Carmichael and Rourke) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of Daly and others) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of A)… [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Legislation providing for partial implemention of section 40 has already won the support of the House of Lords after Baroness Hollins put through an amendment to the investigatory powers bill, which would bring about cost protection for the victims of phone hacking. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Panopticon blog looks at Baroness Neville-Rolfe’s statement on the issue. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
However, the recent Enfish v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Prince is best known as the artist behind the Lenz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
For these reasons the Court said that the Secretary of State would likely need to redraft her guidance, and in particular the provisions for exceptionally disapplying the rule. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
* Baroness Neville-Rolfe DBE CMG is the Baroness in question, being Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and Minister for Intellectual Property. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In ZH (Tanzania) [2011] UKSC 4, Baroness Hale said, [33], “This means that they must be considered first. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
Via Katfriend Justin Watts (Freshfields) comes the link that this Kat has been awaiting, confirming that Baroness Neville-Rolfe has confirmed as a Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (i.e. her former position) at the Departments of Business Industry and Skills jointly with the Department for Culture Media and Sport [= Minister for Intellectual Property. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
R(N) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 799 (Admin) (26 February 2015) [Not on Bailii, we’ve seen a transcript.] [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
