Search for: "State v. Baxter"
Results 81 - 100
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am
In the case of Dershowitz v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs and their treaters are often from the same state, which means there's no diversity of citizenship and no opportunity for the out-of-state drug company to remove the case to federal court.Any case that helps drug companies avoid that result is worth a minute's thought.Joseph v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Board of Trustees of California State University (2010) 48 Cal.4th 760 (Runyon); State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 81 Cal. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
From Belden v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v O’Shea’s-Baxter, LLC, 2014 WL 4116490 (KY 8/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://opinions.kycourts.net/sc/2013-SC-000085-DG.pdf Filed under: Alcohol Sales, Current Caselaw [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v O’Shea’s-Baxter, LLC, 2014 WL 4116490 (KY 8/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://opinions.kycourts.net/sc/2013-SC-000085-DG.pdf Filed under: Alcohol Sales, Current Caselaw [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:39 pm
In today’s case (Baxter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
A post by Brian Baxter notes Ropes & Gray filed a motion on March 23 to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) the Cold Spring Harbor Lab [CSHL] malpractice suit, with Baxter including the text:Ropes & Gray argues that copying text from other patents is a perfectly ethcal and legal practice.The exact text of the R&G brief states:Significantly, CSHL does not contend that there is anything inherently wrong with copying text into a patent application. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm
Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
In Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:18 am
Baxter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Supreme Court case is Sierra Chemical v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 3:47 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
The purpose of that concurring opinion is to express disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s “mistaken belief”—stated most recently in United States v. [read post]
