Search for: "State v. Bean" Results 1 - 20 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm by Ben Vernia
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm by Chris Sutton
Bean, Kinney & Korman will continue to provide relevant updates on this issue and any changes in Title IX’s regulatory requirements. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner  [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
   One such decision was that in Mimo Connect v Buley & Ors, which ended up in the Court of Appeal a month ago with the decision of Lord Justice Bean (giving Judgment of the Court) handed down two weeks ago ([2023] EWCA Civ 909).BackgroundAs she said in the last post, trade secrets cases are full of facts, so buckle in. [read post]