Search for: "State v. Bennett" Results 521 - 540 of 1,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Come prepared for a lively, interactive workshop.World Café Hosts:Dayna Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCharity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawSidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of LawInvited Discussants and Participants:Rodney Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Health AdministrationChristina Juris Bennett, University of Oklahoma College of LawAmy Campbell, University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" However, the Circuit Court dismissed this contention, explaining that such a claim "is not cognizable in a civil case," citing United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:30 am by Richard Murphy
His jumping off point is the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:57 am by John Jascob
The Commission rejected the respondents’ appeal based on the recent Tenth Circuit case Bandimere v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Keith Bennett, election agent to Keith Vaz, has  accepted substantial undisclosed damages from the Telegraph for an allegation that he had misused his status in relation to North Korean visitors to the House of Commons. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:29 am by Douglas Berman
It has now been more than 12 years since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]