Search for: "State v. Berger" Results 41 - 60 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Berger v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam vGottlieb, 309 AD2d 668, 668 [1st Dept 2003].) [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
Berger Held: When stating a claim for breach of fiduciary duty by the board of directors in a stock-for-stock merger, the duty of profit maximization under Shenker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Most dramatically, Glassman states: “absent fraud or illegality, the only recourse for a minority stockholder who is dissatisfied with the merger consideration is appraisal. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers, LLP2023 NY Slip Op 03471 Decided on June 28, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a case which reversed dismissal of a legal malpractice claim. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 pm by Public BLAWG
 The Court distinguished the case factually from its recent decision in Berger v. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and according the plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers, LLP, 217 AD3d 960, 962). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers LLP  2020 NY Slip Op 32828(U)  July 23, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County  Docket Number: 524482/2019  Judge: Richard Velasquez,  Plaintiff alleged that had the attorney been quicker, the defendant would not have been able to leave the US and the judgment would have been collectible. [read post]