Search for: "State v. Bird Head"
Results 121 - 140
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Tangible IP) Global IP law: Two recent publications ‘Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights’ by R Bird and S C Jain and ‘Global Intellectual Property Law’ by G Dutfield and U Suthersanen (IPKat) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What price brands on the balance sheet? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
-China Trade Talks, Encircling the United States). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
We refer of course to Courtney v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:49 am
Environmental economists have a couple of theoretical answers—“[c]ompensating [v]ariation” or “[e]quivalent [v]ariation. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
State Bar of Nevada2:00-2:30 p.m. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
In the Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
The program will also include a panel of IP experts such as Tara Rosnell and Christopher V. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
The heading of the email was as follows:8 Sep 2007 07:29:30–0400From: `rg ... @ . . . [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:46 am
Bird. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
The Supreme Court released an opinion today in Voisine v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
For non-lawyers, remember that unless a given act is itself intended as a communication -- nodding your head, flipping your attorney the bird (who hasn't done that, or at least wanted to?) [read post]
