Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 1 - 20
of 978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 11:46 am
A failure to do so can quash the appeal, as seen in the Reviewing Board decision of Saini v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 11:46 am
A failure to do so can quash the appeal, as seen in the Reviewing Board decision of Saini v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:46 pm
The Supreme Court recognized as much in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
School Dist., 42 AD 3d 633 and Brodsky v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
School Dist., 42 AD 3d 633 and Brodsky v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:40 am
In the case of The Medical Board of California v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
By Jay Levine and Darcy Jalandoni This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm
Jurisprudence on independent medical examinations (IME) in the context of the employer’s duty to accommodate is sparse. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Next week, on October 14, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 10:07 am
The Reviewing Board examined the transcripts of Dr. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The court explained the evidence submitted at the hearing included the Medical Board's physical examination of Petitioner and its exhaustive review of the conflicting medical evidence from examining physicians, as well as Petitioner's acknowledgment that she could, without assistance, "perform daily life activities such as bathing, dressing, and walking. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The court explained the evidence submitted at the hearing included the Medical Board's physical examination of Petitioner and its exhaustive review of the conflicting medical evidence from examining physicians, as well as Petitioner's acknowledgment that she could, without assistance, "perform daily life activities such as bathing, dressing, and walking. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Board of Educ. of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School Dist., 70 NY2d 57, said that it is well-settled that “teachers in this State are generally required to submit to an examination to determine their physical and mental fitness to perform their duties,” and that teachers “therefore have a diminished expectation of privacy with respect to State inquiries into their physical fitness to perform as teachers. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:11 am
The employee was examined by a psychiatrist and an impartial medical examiner, who found that the employee was currently medically disabled. [read post]
