Search for: "State v. Bollinger"
Results 141 - 160
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 2:47 pm
In June, the Supreme Court CVSG'd Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Bollinger] is, for all intents and purposes, overruled. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:59 am
Osborne v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:59 am
Osborne v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm
Bollinger in 2003. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 2:25 am
Bollinger and California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
As the Court put it in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Bollinger & Geoffrey R. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm
Bollinger, the 2003 case in which the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Bollinger upholding the law school's use of race in the admissions process. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Johnson said minority enrollment has fallen despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 2:38 pm
Bollinger and Gratz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:15 am
Bollinger. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Bollinger (2003) -- affirmative actionBrown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
Bollinger, means any statement that passes both tests is admissible under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm
Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
Bollinger and against the background of the debates and practices of diversity in the United States, that the people of Oz sincerely value difference and diversity, even though they do not engage the rhetoric of diversity. [read post]
