Search for: "State v. Booker"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2007, 7:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
R (Booker) v NHS Oldham and Direct Line Insurance PLC [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin)- read judgment The High Court has held that where a claimant agrees a damages settlement that includes an indemnity to fund private nursing care should existing NHS provision be withdrawn, it was unlawful for a primary care trust to cease its funding of the claimant’s care on the basis that her needs would be met through the settlement. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:56 pm
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 7:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 5:29 pm
Washington and United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
” United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:32 am
Here is a link to NMCCA’s latest and greatest En Banc opinion, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
US v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:05 am
The Fifth Circuit issued a notable sentencing ruling yesterday in US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
When Mr Booker says that M’s financial resources have been seized by the British State, he is probably referring to the fact that the court has ordered M’s affairs should be managed by the Official Solicitor NOT Mrs Kirk, who the court evidently does not feel is capable of acting in M’s best interests, despite her belief that she is doing just that. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm
It’s unusual for Booker to stray into private law territory, to comment on a dispute between parents and involving no evil state agents (apart from the judge, natch). [read post]
