Search for: "State v. Brett" Results 161 - 180 of 2,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
, (May 3, 2023).Renato Saeger Magalhaes Costa, Free to Teach: State Limits and the Protection of Private Schools Religious Liberties, (Dignitas — Revista Internacional do Instituto Brasileiro de Direito e Religião,  p. 33-80 (2021).Brett V. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Brett Wilson LLP published a press release about the statement on its blog. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Brett Parker (Stanford University - Department of Political Science) has posted Polarization in State Supreme Courts, 1980-2020 on SSRN. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am by Amy Howe
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  As they note, there were only six states with bans last year when New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  Section 165(4)(a) states that the ICO must “take appropriate steps to respond to the complaint”, which includes (pursuant to section 165(5)(a)) “investigating the subject matter of the complaint, to the extent appropriate”. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  Two others Justices, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh have called themselves originalists and are receptive to originalist arguments, although seem to be open to arguments that precedent should prevail over original meaning, at least in some categories of cases. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]