Search for: "State v. Broadhurst"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
This reduced the value of Part 36 offers in the IPEC and, arguably, made it harder to settle cases.The other side of thePart 36 rainbowSince those cases, the Court of Appeal has considered the impact of fixed costs on Part 36 offers (Broadhurst v Tan [2016] EWCA Civ 94). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
He considered the Court of Appeal case of Broadhurst v Tan and came to the conclusion that Part 36 overrides Part 45 such that “the limits on costs in the IPEC, both stage costs and the overall cap, do not apply to an award of costs under [former] rule 36.14(3)(b). [read post]
Personnel services company pays $9.9 million to settle False Claims Act case for underpaid Visa Fees
10 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Michael Harmon v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:02 pm
See In re Mac Donald, 755 F.2d at 717; In re Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 508-09 (7th Cir.1982); In re Revco D.S., Inc., 99 B.R. 768, 776-77 (N.D.Ohio 1989); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 826-27 (N.D.Ill.1986); Broadhurst v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm
See In re Mac Donald, 755 F.2d at 717 (9th Cir. 1985); In re Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 508-09 (7th Cir.1982); In re Revco D.S., Inc., 99 B.R. 768, 776-77 (N.D.Ohio 1989); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 826-27 (N.D.Ill.1986); Broadhurst v. [read post]
