Search for: "State v. Brodie" Results 161 - 180 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2012, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[Also guest stars Morena Baccarin (who has also played Erica Flynn on "The Mentalist," Jessica Brody on "Homeland" and Anna in "V").] [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Tram in EdinburghThe IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post, drafted by Andrew McWhirter (Brodies Solicitors) concerning a recent Scottish trade secrets decision: Bilfinger v Edinburgh Tram Inquiry.Here’s what Andrew writes: “It is no secret (amongst local residents at least) that the publicly-funded Edinburgh tram project was seriously delayed, and cost almost double the original estimate at nearly £1 billion. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Hardoon, with whom Deirdre Brennan Regan and Brody, Hardoon, Perkins & Kersten, LLP, were on brief, for appellants Neighborhood Association of the Back Bay, Inc., The Boston Preservation Alliance, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am by INFORRM
The article merely stated that “questions were raised” about her due diligence. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
Massachusetts White Collar Crime Prof Blog Sotomayor and White Collar Crime Opinions The Numbers Confirm that Sotomayor is “Tough on White Collar Crime” Disability Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Preliminary Review of Disability Cases of Judge Sonia Sotomayor Elections Election Law Blog Viewing Judge Sotomayor Through Her Election Law Decisions: Careful, Thoughtful, Mainstream Leaning Left Environmental Climate Intel  Souter, Sotomayor and the Future of… [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm by jefhenninger
   A good example of willful blindness is found in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am by Legal Beagle
The amended Form 23.4 stated that the motion should be refused on the basis that the applicant was not directly affected by the issues raised in the petition and lacked the necessary interest and standing to justify her participating in the proceedings. [3] Rather than taking further time to explore the factual dispute, I proceeded on the basis that, as Miss Crabbe claimed, written opposition to her motion had only been intimated to her on 3 May 2012 and that therefore there had been a… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Brodies websit had a piece entitled “Stuart Campbell v Kezia Dugdale and the defence of fair comment for defamation in Scotland“. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]