Search for: "State v. Burling"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The ban was the subject of multiple lawsuits including Stone v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
” James Burling of the Pacific Legal Foundation summarizes the court’s recent decisions on environmental issues, property rights, the administrative state and school choice and finds them “a mixed bag for individual liberty and constitutional limits. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Burls 19-1291Issues: (1) Whether qualified immunity is an affirmative defense that state actors must assert, as nine U.S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
In Williams v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am
It’s not law yet, of course, but there are a lot of ways that the decision in Shea v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am
” In an op-ed at Townhall, James Burling maintains that “[t]he just-ended Supreme Court term went exceedingly well for individual liberty[:] From property rights to government agencies to offensive words, there were triumphs for individual rights and a pushback against the encroaching regulatory state. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:21 pm
Charlesworth (Covington & Burling LLP) discussed how over the past few years courts have had the opportunity to shape primary and secondary liability principles while interpreting section 512 safe harbours.Joseph C. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am
In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
United States, 202 F.3d 1360, 1363 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
In Luxottica Group SpA. v. [read post]
