Search for: "State v. Buyers Service Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:26 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:16 am
See Collins Inkjet Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:04 pm
Effingham-Clay Service Co. for the proposition that substantial compliance was good enough. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:47 am
In due course, Reignwood was replaced as the buyer by a single purpose vehicle, Opus Tiger 1 Pte. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
” In Saffie v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Holmes Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
In part IV of our continuing series on the end of cheap China and the impacts arising from that, co-blogger Steve Dickinson wrote about the increased risks product buyers are facing from their China-based manufacturers. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:41 am
"
Richlin Security Service Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
Christopher & Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:36 pm
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
Refusal to Sell Bulk-Size Packs, Without More, Is Not Price Discrimination – “Size is Not a Service”
26 Aug 2016, 8:52 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
