Search for: "State v. Cabbage"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
So, of course, I had to look up the case, which is Nix v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
" The Cabbage Patch Kids dolls were at the heart of a dispute in the case entitled, Original Appalachian Artworks v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:51 am
The Circuit notes that Jackler v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
[Behrend v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:41 am
State governments were supposed to serve as “laborator[ies]” of democracy, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:50 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.The Law Lady. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
STATE COURT; SALES REP AT ISSUE, Gibbs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
He claims the phrase is meant to promote local agriculture (kale is a type of cabbage). [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Yes, it’s time to roll out Nix v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Here is the list:i) Tickle Me Elmo; (ii) Beanie Babies; (iii) Silly Bandz; (iv) Pet Rocks; (v) Tamagotchi; (vi) Cabbage Patch Kids; (vii) OGs; (viii) Furby; ix) Bratz Dolls; and (x) the Rubik's Cube An impressive list of improbably commercially successful toys, but in this Kat's eyes, one of them stands out: the success of the Pet Rock in the mid-1970’s. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am
Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, writing in Foreign Policy, argues that the United States should ratchet up pressure on China over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands by mimicking China’s “cabbage” defense strategy. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(CSI) v. [read post]
