Search for: "State v. Carmichael"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999); Weisgram v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Gelbach states his claim in the context of discussing a single randomized controlled trial (ASCOT-LLA), but his broad pronouncements are carelessly framed such that others may take them to apply to a single observational study, with its greater threats to internal validity. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Dignity Health, a case about a transgender patient at a Catholic hospital, the Mercy San Juan Medical Center in Carmichael, California. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm
The question came to the court in a case filed by a transgender patient, Evan Minton, who wanted a hysterectomy and alleges that the hospital, Mercy San Juan Medical Center in Carmichael, California, refused to allow the doctor to perform it, in violation of state civil rights laws. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:59 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999). [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The Ordinance took effect on October 1, 2020, and sunsets on December 31, 2020, but it is possible it may be extended if the state of emergency continues. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:30 pm
In Carmichael v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
§ 11111(a)(2)/ [8] Fullerton v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Eventually, Judge Benner leaves it to Judge Carmichael to figure out a way to handle it. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999). [5] Weisgram v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 52 The question of the powers of the First Tier and Upper Tribunals (and indeed initial decision makers) to disapply secondary legislation where there is a breach of the appellant’s human rights has reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[iii] United States v. [read post]
