Search for: "State v. Carmichael" Results 121 - 140 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm by Barbara Moreno
., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999); Weisgram v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:29 am by Schachtman
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 152 (1999). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
A RULING in the latest hearing of the Heather Capital case by three judges at the Court of Session has granted proof hearings against law firms Levy & Mcrae and Burness Paul LLP.The decision is bound to be an uncomfortable one for Scotland’s senior judges as the case has direct links back to the judiciary itself, revealed when Lord President Lord Brian Gill was forced to suspend Sheriff Peter Black Watson after Watson was named in a writ launched by Heather Capital’s liquidator in… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 137 (1999) (discussing Daubert v. [read post]