Search for: "State v. Chestnut"
Results 141 - 160
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The opinion concludes by quoting Brandeis's hoary chestnut about states as laboratories of experiment, thus throwing the "federalism" gauntlet before, say, Anthony Kennedy, who often writes of the "dignity" of states and the necessity of federal courts to protect that dignity against those who would unduly limit state autonomy. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
Usery (1976) but in lesser-known opinions like New York v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
He took ill and died there on May 3, 1853, surrounded by his family at the United States Hotel on Chestnut Street between Fifth and Sixth Streets. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
He took ill and died there on May 3, 1853, surrounded by his family at the United States Hotel on Chestnut Street between Fifth and Sixth Streets. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:36 am
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Chestnut v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:01 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
The second new relist is Chestnut v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:35 pm
INS v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:53 am
In UMG v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
But the opinion does, to quote an administrative law chestnut, “express[] a mood” (from 1951’s Universal Camera Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 386, 397 (Tex. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
In Apple v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
