Search for: "State v. City of Melbourne"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
City of Melbourne, 2008 U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:18 pm
Case law on the reporting on alleged irregularities in the conduct of State officials (Zakharov v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v City of New York. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
City of Melbourne, Fla., 96 F.3d 478, 482 (11th Cir.1996); Univ. of S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:39 am
Suntree Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
In fall 2008, the City of West Melbourne began soliciting bids for a project that required nine baffle boxes. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
Beatriz Busaniche, another member of Vía Libre added: The whole implementation of e-voting was imposed through an Executive Decree from the Government of the City of Buenos Aires, while the law clearly states that for the use of electronic voting, an special majority in the Legislature is needed (4894 Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Victoria is a state in southeast Australia. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Jason Bosland, Deputy Director of the Centre for Media and Communications Law at Melbourne Law School, has called for the introduction of a state-funded Open Justice Advocate as a measure to alleviate the continuing practice of judges issuing overly restrictive suppression orders. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
- Melbourne Health Management Associates - Naples International Assets Holding Corp. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
City of Melbourne, Fla., 731 F.3d 1161, 1166 (11th Cir.2013) (citing Monell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:59 am
City of Melbourne, 731 F.3d 1161, 1168 (11th Cir. 2013), the Supreme Court in Pickering, 391 U.S. at 568, ruled that the state must strike “a balance between the interests of the [employee], as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
In the case of Hategan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 5:05 pm
They noted that the court had upheld the city's use of eminent domain in a split decision and put the issue back in states' hands. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
The Press Gazette had a piece “Hull Daily Mail takes down front page cycling story after wrongly accusing bikers of flouting city centre ban”. [read post]
