Search for: "State v. Coca"
Results 81 - 100
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 8:02 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Peter V. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:10 am
(1993); Healy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Coca-Cola Co., 578 F.3d 1252, 1258 n.5 (11th Cir. 2009), and Romero v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
” That was enough to show standing, as required by Spokeo v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:06 am
Ackerman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
The recent non-precedential opinion of Automated Tracking Solutions v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
On Thursday in DePierre v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:17 am
The lower court ruled that the FDCA – a federal law that gives the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) the authority to ensure the safety of a variety of goods, including beverages – precluded POM’s Lanham Act claims concerning the labeling and naming of the Coca-Cola beverage. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 2:45 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 am
Ackerman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 157 S.C. 352, 154 S.E. 424 (1930) (dead yellow jacket in soft drink);Burnette v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. is outdated.) [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
Oshana v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 2013 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:07 am
Royal Crown Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
Coca-Cola Company, 578 F.3d 1252, (2009). [read post]