Search for: "State v. Constantine"
Results 121 - 135
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
(Compare Constantine V. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
The CJEU has had to analyse blocking orders in the case of UPC Telekabel v Constantin Film & Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft (C‑314/12). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Kimbrough, Constantine A. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Benedict Mawn v 89. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast, where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
How will it affect merger enforcement in the United States? [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
