Search for: "State v. Coughlin" Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Rules of the State Civil Service Commission, which apply to State officers and employees, provide that "every resignation shall be in writing" [4 NYCRR 5.3]. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 12:26 pm by Austin Mehr
See Minneapolis Firefighters’ Relief Ass’n v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
         Evidence of IntoxicationIn the case of Coughlin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, in Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014, the Court of Appeals upheld the removal of a state correction officer following his conviction of a felony under federal law. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, the court ruled that under both state and federal law any statement made under the threat of dismissal from one's position is protected by the privilege against self-incrimination and is “automatically immunized from use in criminal proceedings. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]