Search for: "State v. Coughlin"
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 2:00 am
” Gibbons v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Griffin, Snyder v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
In Eisai Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
But the Supremes did rule in Ali v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Siegel, Before (and after) Roe V. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
McIntosh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
This was demonstrated in the Appellate Division’s ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case involving a tenured State employee, the Court of Appeals said the employer could threaten the employee with disciplinary action if he or she did not resign. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
The settlement in Watson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
” Coughlin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:50 am
Chiara v. [read post]
